Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!platinum.sge.net!como.dpie.gov.au!news.gan.net.au!act.news.telstra.net!brian.telstra.net!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.unimelb.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!visi.com!news-out.visi.com!chippy.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!news-xfer.netaxs.com!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!ddsw1!not-for-mail From: les@MCS.COM (Leslie Mikesell) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: smbfs under FreeBSD? Date: 1 Jul 1997 00:48:05 -0500 Organization: /usr/lib/news/organi[sz]ation Lines: 21 Message-ID: <5pa5ml$8sd$1@Venus.mcs.net> References: <33AFCEA5.167EB0E7@IBC.IskraSistemi.Si> <01bc82a8$ed23e340$b4cc93cf@thewall> <slrn5r73pq.cjm.hdm@stress.noc.demon.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: venus.mcs.net Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:43754 In article <slrn5r73pq.cjm.hdm@stress.noc.demon.net>, Dominic Mitchell <hdm@demon.net> wrote: >Earlier, J.C. Archambeau <n-xiv@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >> It doesn't exist and my impression from a previous thread on this subject >> is that even if someone does write it, it may not become part of the >> official distribution. Why? Security (or severe lack thereof). Because >> of the design limitations of SMBFS, it will never be secure. Samba is >> about as good as you'll get with any of the BSD projects. > >To expand with this, the problem is that it authenticates on a per user >basis, which is no use at all in a multi-user environment... That's a bit extreme. I've seen many situations where it is useful to share access to files. Besides it is also common for a unix box to only have a single user these days. The point is that you have to be root to perform a mount and if the root user thinks that it is appropriate for other users to have access to the mounted media then that's the way it should be. Les Mikesell les@mcs.com