*BSD News Article 98055


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.Hawaii.Edu!news.caldera.com!enews.sgi.com!nntprelay.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!europa.clark.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!arg1.demon.co.uk!server.arg.sj.co.uk!nobody
From: Andrew Gordon <andrew.gordon@arg1.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and ISDN -- final analysis?
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 00:21:05 +0100
Message-ID: <33A9BEE1.41C67EA6@arg1.demon.co.uk>
References: <5obd62$18v@news.gvsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arg1.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: arg1.demon.co.uk [194.222.34.166]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE i386)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:43183

Matt Behrens wrote:
> 1. The FreeBSD handbook states that ISDN is possible simply by hooking it
>    up to the serial port and using PPP, albeit limited to 115Kbps.

This is true - for all operating systems.  ISDN external TAs that
emulate
modems do indeed work exactly like modems.  Unfortunately, this mode of
use loses many of the benefits of ISDN - but if you are just considering
ISDN as a faster replacement for a modem link, you may not care.

> 2. Joerg (my apologies if I mispelled the name, I am a product of the
>    American public education system after all) ;) said in a post about a
>    month ago that ISDN needed the BISDN package, which was in a state of
>    incompleteness due to a need for complete rewrites right now.

This is also true, but misleading.  BISDN is perfectly usable despite
the
need for rewrite; you will find it in the /xperimnt directory on the
last
few FreeBSD CD-ROM releases among other places.  This version is very
stable,
and implements IP over raw HDLC, plus inbound telephony (answerphone
etc.).
Patches are also available to do PPP; these are a bit of a hack but work
adequately well.

However, the main reason for not using BISDN is if you live in the USA:
BISDN implements the standard Q.931 protocols (as published by the
International Telecommunication Union, and widely used in Europe and
elsewhere); unfortunately, American telephone companies have chosen
to implement a variety of incompatible protocols.