Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.new-york.net!nonexistent.com!not-for-mail From: le@put.com (Louis Epstein) Subject: Re: New 3.0-SNAP [was Re: infinite loop in sysinstall] X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@news2.new-york.net if this posting is inappropriate Lines: 24 Organization: Putnam Internet Services Message-ID: <EA2wM9.3Gu@nonexistent.com> References: <5kije3$7ke$2@news9.gte.net> <336D27CA.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org> <slrn5mupgs.1mq.pavanas@nomina.ccia.com> <33714FFB.446B9B3D@FreeBSD.org> <E9vwLD.EFz@nonexistent.com> <337314B2.15FB7483@FreeBSD.org> <E9xKAH.IBJ@nonexistent.com> <3373FBB8.3F54BC7E@FreeBSD.org> <E9yEv5.IG6@nonexistent.com> <5l60js$r1g@usenet.rpi.edu> X-Trace: 863458207 110 le [165.254.191.2] X-Nntp-Posting-Host: main.put.com Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 17:30:08 GMT Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:40765 Garance A Drosehn (gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu) wrote: : le@put.com (Louis Epstein) wrote: : > Jordan K. Hubbard (jkh@FreeBSD.org) wrote: : > : I doubt that we'll be driving anyone out of business, but I : > : certainly hope to see FreeBSD running on truly aggressive : > : SMP implementations, yes. : > : > Well,by year end it should be possible to show off a 3.0 release : > on a four-Pentium II-300MHz system,and demonstrate how it benchmarks : > the pants off a Pentium-75 running WinNT and a Pentium-90 running : > Linux, and start some cool flamewars... : : I don't follow the world of intel all that much, but my understanding : was that the Pentium-II chip is not geared up for four-processor : systems. The Pentium Pro can be used in four-processor systems, : but the Pentium-II stops at dual-processors. : : (I could very well be wrong on that, I just read it on some web : page articles about the Pentium-II release). It would certainly be a strange backward step for Intel's extending the top of their line...would it be from a drawback in their cartridge design, and how would they get around it?Are they going to let AMD and Cyrix take the 4-8 processor SMP market while they redesign?