*BSD News Article 95092


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!ais.net!uunet!in3.uu.net!165.254.2.53!nonexistent.com!not-for-mail
From: le@put.com (Louis Epstein)
Subject: Re: New 3.0-SNAP [was Re: infinite loop in sysinstall]
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@news2.new-york.net if this posting is inappropriate
Lines: 27
Organization: Putnam Internet Services
Message-ID: <E9vwLD.EFz@nonexistent.com>
References: <5kije3$7ke$2@news9.gte.net> <336D27CA.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org> <slrn5mupgs.1mq.pavanas@nomina.ccia.com> <33714FFB.446B9B3D@FreeBSD.org>
X-Trace: 863131583 17903 le [165.254.191.2]
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: main.put.com
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 22:46:25 GMT
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:40590

Jordan K. Hubbard (jkh@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
: pavanas abludo incusus wrote:
: > it was clearly apparent that any attempt to install either many packages
: > or large packages (emacs etc) intially was doomed to failure. this is my
: > first BSD experience (and it was an experience). i did have a problem
: 
: OK, I fixed the bugger.
: 
: The 3.0-970505-SNAP which is currently uploading (right now) to
: ftp.freebsd.org has this problem fixed.  This should also be considered
: a replacement for 3.0-970502-SNAP since the upcoming SNAPshot CD from
: Walnut Creek CDROM will also feature 3.0-970505-SNAP, and I don't like
: there being any disparity between what you can get off the net and what
: you can get from CD.
: 
: Sorry for the inconvenience to those mirrors and end-users who wasted
: their time downloading the 3.0-970502-SNAP only to run into the package
: installer bug (and those users who didn't can probably just keep running
: the 0502 SNAP; not *that* much changed in 3 days :-).  I don't like
: releasing snapshots this closely back-to-back but it's a lot better to
: do that then make the CDROM users somehow "elite" in getting better bits
: than what are available from the net.

428,502,505...is three SNAPs in a week a record?

(I assume SNAP CD subscribers will only get 3.0 SNAPs now,even if there
is a 2.2.x-SNAP release between RELENG and 2.2.5-RELEASE?)