Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.new-york.net!news.put.com!main.put.com!le From: Louis Epstein <le@main.put.com> Subject: Re: RELENG vs SNAP? Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@xxx.video-collage.com> Sender: usenet@news.put.com (The Root) Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970430181735.5050A-100000@main.put.com> References: <E9Gr70.30x@nonexistent.com> <199704302229.SAA11945@xxx.video-collage.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199704302229.SAA11945@xxx.video-collage.com> X-Nntp-Posting-Host: main.put.com Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 18:18:06 GMT Lines: 15 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:40067 On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > In article <E9Gr70.30x@nonexistent.com>, > le@put.com (Louis Epstein) writes: > > How is a RELENG FreeBSD like the April 22 2.2.x different from a SNAP > > FreeBSD like the 970209 3.0? > > Check comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.announce for explanations. > Shortly, SNAPSHOTs are more likely to work -- RELENG-today is > "what the SNAPSHOT-today would be, if it was made today" Hmm,I thought was what -current was like!