*BSD News Article 92891


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!worldnet.att.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!howland.erols.net!torn!news1.bellglobal.com!bellglobal.com!c_chaos
From: c_chaos@chaosnet.wahnapitae.on.ca (Andrew Costa)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD (or something else?)
Date: 4 Apr 1997 23:25:49 GMT
Organization: Haywire Engineering
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <slrn5kb3hr.ba.c_chaos@chaosnet.wahnapitae.on.ca>
References: <slrn5kaf5t.11r.c_chaos@chaosnet.wahnapitae.on.ca> <01bc4136$20f68ec0$78c5a9c6@win95>
Reply-To: seagull@osiris.isys.ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: annex1-port24.isys.ca
X-Newsreader: slrn (0.9.3.2 UNIX)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.os.linux:19844 comp.os.linux.misc:168190 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:38534

In article <01bc4136$20f68ec0$78c5a9c6@win95>, Jason Ish wrote:
>
>Take a minute here and think about the 'average computer user.'  MS has
>been great at getting ordinary people to use a computer, even tho if it is
>for future marketing.  Does the average user really care where their
>programs are installed.  I do a lot of service at people's homes and they
>don't even know Windows 95 is an OS.  They just take it for granted that it
>runs their programs.  Never have I seen a Unix system that can be taken for
>granted - ie, setting up modems and stuff has to be done very explicitly. 
>Maybe there are some Unix's out there that can be taken for granted but I'm
>only a 2nd year CS student and haven't seen one yet.

True, the "average" tends to ignorance of the workings.
What's a pain in the @rse for the likes of us (config files modified or
deleted by a new MS application, requiring work to recover the subsequently
broken competitors' apps) is a disaster for them: they give up on what no
longer works as a result and buy the equivalent MS product.

That's what I'm objecting to.  It is fundamentally dishonest.

By the way, I looked through Mum's drive (she's one of the "average" users)
and couldn't believe the mess!  Fully 2/3 of it could go without affecting
operation.  That thing had been so badly spammed by various "setup" progs,
it was next to impossible to navigate.

I wonder how many who are running out of space on their 540 and contemplating
a new 1.6 gig drive could be better served by a thorough house cleaning.