*BSD News Article 92878


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!news.ifm.liu.se!compisII.rydnet.lysator.liu.se!perle
From: perle@compisII.rydnet.lysator.liu.se (Per Lewau)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD (or something else?)
Date: 6 Apr 1997 01:27:44 GMT
Organization: Linköping University, Sweden
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <5i6u6g$ilb$1@newsy.ifm.liu.se>
References: <332c9a76.3278270@news.adelaide.on.net> <01bc32f2$3783f300$04000001@Colin> <E79F14.n7z@forthdv.pfm-mainz.de> <332f5ffb.519605@news.sprynet.com> <5h51ma$b1u$2@kayrad.ziplink.net> <3337e3ad.1847437@news.sprynet.com> <5hbh2g$gah$1@kayrad.ziplink.net> <333990e3.2587820@news.sprynet.com> <333EE698.41C67EA6@kzin.dorm.umd.edu> <3343cbbf.1091644@news.sprynet.com> <5i1216$gc4$1@news3.realtime.net> <33457087.6003026@news.sprynet.com> <E84Kwp.8ox@nonexistent.com> <3346646b.68448149@news.sprynet.com> <E84y
08.JqI@nonexistent.com>
Reply-To: perle@lysator.liu.se
NNTP-Posting-Host: compisii.rydnet.lysator.liu.se
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.os.linux:19823 comp.os.linux.misc:168135 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:38507

In article <E84y08.JqI@nonexistent.com>, le@put.com (Louis Epstein) writes:
|> Goatboy (lcappite@sprynet.com) wrote:
|> : >If you want to look at the UNIX family tree,you trace back to Multics,
|> : >of which Unics(as it was first spelled) was a single-processor version
|> : >(so is SMP UNIX really Multix?);if you do the same for NT,you get
|> : >Seattle Computer's Quick and Dirty Operating System for 8088s,
|> : >designed to make CP/M apps portable for an 8-bit data line leading
|> : >into 16-bit logic.
|> : 
|> : NT was not even remotely based on Q-DOS.
|> 
|> Q-DOS->MS-DOS->W*nd*ws->NT.
|> Where do you see a lack of continuity?

Rather:

Q-DOS->MS-DOS->W*nd*ws->Win95
Multics -> Unix -> VMS -> Digital NT kernel -> M$ Win NT

That's actually closer to the truth.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Lewau (perle@lysator.org)	Student of Computer Science at 
				Linköping University, Sweden. 
"Don't quote me; that's what you heard, not what I said."
						- Lawrence K. Frank