*BSD News Article 92717


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!irz401!orion.sax.de!uriah.heep!news
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD (or something else?)
Date: 3 Apr 1997 22:53:16 GMT
Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <5i1ccs$fo@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <332c9a76.3278270@news.adelaide.on.net>
  <01bc32f2$3783f300$04000001@colin> <E79F14.n7z@forthdv.pfm-mainz.de>
  <332f5ffb.519605@news.sprynet.com> <5h51ma$b1u$2@kayrad.ziplink.net>
  <3337e3ad.1847437@news.sprynet.com> <5hbh2g$gah$1@kayrad.ziplink.net>
  <333990e3.2587820@news.sprynet.com> <E7zMs5.H15@nemesis.lonestar.org>
  <334257A8.41C67EA6@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6
X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669
X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F  93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:38380 alt.os.linux:19735 comp.os.linux.misc:167856

"John S. Dyson" <dyson@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Frank Durda IV wrote:
> > 
> > Goatboy (lcappite@sprynet.com) wrote:
> > : What *significant* things can UNIX do that NT4 or 95 can't?
> > 
> > I've got a good one.  Run NT4 with Microsofts News Server software.
> > Try to receive articles and administer the newsgroup
> >         comp.unix.aux
> > Go on, try it.  You will find that every time you ask about
> > directory "aux" the system will come back and say "\\ not found".
> > 
> > Same probably goes for any group names that include the fields
> >         com, prn, lpt, sys, nul, aux
> > and all of those other "DOS-ish" magic words.  CP/M and its
> > restrictions are apparently alive and well in NT.
> > 
> I haven't tried, but there is a register entry for each of the
> bogus DOS names.  I wonder if the problem will go away if you
> remove those???  Of course, if that fixes the problem, then
> that shows an example of the complexity of using NT for serious
> work.  Then, I wonder how many apps will break then?
> 
> John
> 

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)