*BSD News Article 92649


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news-xfer.netaxs.com!news.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!gazette.engr.sgi.com!news
From: Ron Fischer <ronf@studio.sgi.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.sys.sgi.misc
Subject: Re: no such thing as a "general user community"
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 1997 00:49:39 -0800
Organization: Silicon Graphics
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <33436F23.59E2@studio.sgi.com>
References: <331BB7DD.28EC@net5.net> <5g9hjp$api@flea.best.net>
	    <5gmb58$6jd$1@news.clinet.fi> <5gn3ig$83d@flea.best.net>
	    <5goqrq$5ak$1@news.clinet.fi> <5hd29s$e7t@fido.asd.sgi.com>
	    <333C1614.ABD@sgi01.grn.aera.com> <5hhv1k$jh9@fido.asd.sgi.com>
	    <333E3530.794B@sgi01.grn.aera.com> <333EA3EF.41C67EA6@consys.com>
	    <333EE416.ABD322C@FreeBSD.org> <5hn00k$dio@fido.asd.sgi.com>
	    <333F45A6.41C67EA6@FreeBSD.org> <5hpolu$9t2@fido.asd.sgi.com>
	    <3340CC28.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org> <5hveu5$rhj$1@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: isdn-tesla.corp.sgi.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01SC-SGI (X11; I; IRIX 6.2 IP22)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:38332 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:6559 comp.sys.sgi.misc:29631

I guess you could start by asking: what's the dynamic of an
unmoderated "general netnews" group?

"Mine's bigger|cheaper than yours"

This is an engineering oriented discussion, and the bias toward
technical competition in discussion is the same reason Unix
failed to reach beyond its niche user bases in desktop computing.

"GE: We bring good things to life"

The more "general" the user community the harder to create a
product which is universally understood, accepted and
differentiated from that of competitors.  The software company
(or amalgam of companies) spends most of its time identifying
what it is and communicating that to its general (but
individually diverse) user community.

"Marketing is a face talking"

The more "general" a user community, the more dependant on
marketing a product's success in that community will become.
Simple messages are easier to get across so, no matter the
underlying complexity, a more general product must present
a simple unified "face."

"Unix has no face"

The Unix provider amalgam (free & otherwise) isn't acting
"general."  It doesn't need a "Maximum leader" but perhaps
a "Maximum face," e.g. logo on the box, marketing team?
But, usually only a leader/board can create these things.

"Big and poor" or "small and rich"

So the Unix market, instead of having large markets by
working to appear unified/simple, has slammed to the other
end of the axes, with differentiated vendors going for
smaller markets with higher unit margins.

"Why do they care?"

How can a "general" customer respond, i.e. understand,
agree & care about the value Unix & its supporters are
bringing to a solution?

"Just the facts"

If its a niche problem (Unix strength) with a narrow audience
then facts can suffice, insofar as metrics that characterize
the solution can be agreed upon.  I.e. what measurements have
meaning for this problem's solution?  Cost of purchase?  Cost
of development & support?  Stability of companies?
Reliability/Redundancy of staff skills?

"Knee jerk"

But as described above, the more general the problem the
more likely its general user group will need a simplified
emotional appeal, regardless of the underlying complexity
of the actual solution.  The techniques of propoganda
roam here (see "GE theme" above).

"Both sides now"

And so we're back to the dynamic of "general netnews" i.e.
the flaming style that this discussion dips into.
Simplified or emotional appeals are the tools of marketing
to broader user bases, but it seems to get used (and possibly
accepted) even for narrower technical discussion, e.g.
appeals to common sense.

But beware: Unix is strong when it uses less easily refutable
facts in narrow problem domains, if you get into broader
areas you'll find yourself quickly arguing against the output
of the bigger and slicker propoganda engines at MS/Intel.

Of course, it might just be fun to throw epithets at cohorts ;)

-- 
ron.f();