Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!serv.hinet.net!news-peer.nctu.edu.tw!news.nctu.edu.tw!spring.edu.tw!cyclic.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Stronghold and other binaries for OpenBSD 2.0 Supersedes: <5hcrk0$fia@panix2.panix.com> Date: 26 Mar 1997 23:05:07 -0500 Organization: Panix Lines: 20 Message-ID: <5hcrlj$fmo@panix2.panix.com> References: <5hbjqi$20j@ocean.silcom.com> <3339D4C9.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org> <5hcngo$oju$1@threadway.teeny.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com X-Newsposter: trn 4.0-test55 (26 Feb 97) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc:30 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:37867 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2895 In article <5hcngo$oju$1@threadway.teeny.org>, Jason Downs <downsj@threadway.teeny.org> wrote: >In article <3339D4C9.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org>, > "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>David Carmean wrote: >>> OpenBSD was recommended because of the security stance "out of >>> the box". My question is about binary application (read: commercial) >> >>Sigh. That stance is getting a little old. > >Yes, I can imagine why you'd feel that way. > I'm sure you can imagine many things, Jason. -- Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com Most things do not correlate with actual behavior. -George Conklin