Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!uwm.edu!msunews!netnews.upenn.edu!news From: angelos@coredump.cis.upenn.edu (Angelos D. Keromytis) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Which of *BSD for notebook?? Date: 23 Mar 1997 16:42:32 -0500 Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 12 Message-ID: <hb3vi6iffp3.fsf@coredump.cis.upenn.edu> References: <8667yow688.fsf@kiste-5.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coredump.cis.upenn.edu X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:37613 comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc:23 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5683 Marko Schuetz <marko@kiste-5.ki.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> writes: > > I do not have the notebook yet. If there is any comment on which > notebook to get (or to avoid due to problems) please let me know. > NetBSD and OpenBSD work fine on the Toshiba Tecras, except possible for the APM suspend (deep sleep mode); but i haven't tested that lately. -Angelos --