Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!stade.demon.co.uk!stade!aw1 From: aw1@stade.co.uk (Adrian Wontroba) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.sys.sgi.misc Subject: Re: What does the user community think? Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 10:14:35 GMT Organization: Stade Computers Limited, UK Message-ID: <E6KF4C.pF@stade.co.uk> References: <331BB7DD.28EC@net5.net> Reply-To: aw1@stade.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Host: stade.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: stade.demon.co.uk Lines: 58 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.sco.misc:36107 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:36647 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:6225 comp.sys.sgi.misc:28893 [Mailed and posted] According to N Shaw <admin@net5.net>: >We are totally a SGI & SUN house. > >I am trying out BSDI, freeBSD and SCO OS5 to see if it is feasible to >run on the INTEL platform. > >In my opinion SCO seems to be the best of the lot. > >I would like to find out what the general user community thinks? You don't say what you're intending to do with the system(s), which makes it difficult to comment on what is "best". But I will. I'm a computer "consultant" (contractor). My main professional area of expertise is in an aging mainframe database system and and its operating system, but have always had a penchant for UNIX, C etc. I've been running SCO UNIX on my own machines for close on a decade. SCO has (many) good points, pay for support, a thriving net support community and a probable rosy future (the tie up with HP, acquisition of Unixware etc). SCO have worked hard to make SCO UNIX "modern" and "compatible", with a lot of success. OS5 has moved on a long way from Open Desk Top - known fondly and more accurately by SCO's own programmers as "Open Death Trap". OS5 is good. Despite this, my recent experiences with setting up another web server for ACCU under FreeBSD have convinced me that the time has come for me to ditch SCO and convert to FreeBSD, as it works, is very stable, has good support, and has an unbeatable price. I initially chose it over LINUX as, being BSD based, it should be better at comms and has a more tightly controlled development - all official FreeBSD changes and releases go through one group of hard working and dedicated people. This is not to denigrate LINUX - the server mentioned in my sig runs under it, and runs well. The looser control means that there is a lot more LINUX software out there. However, one of main needs for this server was stability, and FreeBSD is reputedly more stable. Basicly, you should evaluate[*], take your choice and pay your money (or not). With a commercial UNIX, you at least have the get out that if something goes bad you wave the "we paid for support - provide it" stick. To be seen waving this could be career-preserving. This is probably one of the main reasons why so many organisations ignore the Free Software world - if it goes wrong, and you can't fix it or get it fixed, there is nobody else to blame. Also - visit the FreeBSD web site and check out the gallery - you may be surprised by some of the FreeBSD users you find there. [*] If you can afford the costs (time, effort, disruption) try several of the alternatives for months on low-risk projects, to find out which really works best for you. -- Adrian Wontroba, Stade Computers Limited. phone: (+44) 121 373 9546 Mail info@accu.org for information about the Association of C and C++ Users or see <http://bach.cis.temple.edu/accu>