Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!news.radio.cz!newsbreeder.radio.cz!news.radio.cz!CESspool!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!posts.execpc.com!usenet From: scotthom@execpc.com (Scott Thomason) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: freebsd performance vs. NT Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 23:32:11 GMT Organization: Exec-PC BBS Internet - Milwaukee, WI Lines: 13 Message-ID: <5et8eh$t8n@newsops.execpc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: maybelle.execpc.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:36054 I'd like to set up a webserver that gains internet access via my ISP. I plan to have lotsa server-side processing via cgi and ??? It would be easy to choose NT4.0, especially because I would have more server-side processing options than cgi, but I thought perhaps the performance of freebsd might make it possible to get away with a smaller, less expensive box. So... Can anyone characterize the relative performance of freebsd vs. NT with a handful of concurrent web users, especially in the areas of memory consumption, cpu%, webserver throughput, and cgi overhead? Also, can you run Java programs/servlets in any way under freebsd?