Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.netspace.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!news.radio.cz!newsbreeder.radio.cz!news.radio.cz!CESspool!news.maxwell.syr.edu!europa.clark.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!howland.erols.net!news3.cac.psu.edu!news.cse.psu.edu!usenet From: schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu.NO-SPAM (Scott Schwartz) Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: [??] pure kernel vs. dual concurrency implementations Date: 22 Feb 1997 20:38:39 -0500 Organization: PSU CSE Lines: 9 Sender: schwartz@galapagos.cse.psu.edu Message-ID: <8gn2swxpwh.fsf@galapagos.cse.psu.edu> References: <330CE6A4.63B0@cet.co.jp> <874tf7lbxc.fsf@serpentine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: galapagos.cse.psu.edu In-reply-to: Bryan O'Sullivan's message of 20 Feb 1997 07:44:31 -0800 To: Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.programming.threads:3282 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35983 Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> writes: | m> * simpler model, less complicated scheduler | | Arguments from simplicity are oftentimes seductive and misleading, if | what you are trying to achieve is good performance. On the other hand, if you look at actual systems, like Plan 9, you find that they are very fast in addition to being simple.