*BSD News Article 89652


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!news.itd.umich.edu!rees
From: rees@umich.edu (Jim Rees)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why no addusr?
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 13:34:06 EST
Organization: University of Michigan CITI
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <1997Feb18.133406@luckey.citi.umich.edu>
References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <1997Feb14.090136@screwem.citi.umich.edu> <5e312c$fc8@news.bayarea.net> <1997Feb15.102158@screwem.citi.umich.edu> <5e4t6b$o5p@cynic.portal.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: luckey.citi.umich.edu
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5489

In article <5e4t6b$o5p@cynic.portal.ca>, cjs@cynic.portal.ca (Curt Sampson) writes:

  I do understand that Jim Rees submitted a patch to wd.c to Charles
  Hannum, rather than submitting it as a PR.

Actually, I sent it to Herb Peyerl and he sent it to Charles.  I never heard
back what, if anything, was done with it.  I would be very surprised to
learn that it was ever blindly integrated into any version of NetBSD without
being examined by a disk expert.

All of it was later incorporated into OpenBSD, except for a one line fix to
the interrupt routine that is required on three of my machines but
apparently violates some spec and causes trouble on other machines.  I
continue to patch around this.

I did send several bug reports (what should I call them?) to various NetBSD
people but never filed a PR.  I won't make that mistake again.