*BSD News Article 89552


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.primenet.com!bkogawa
From: bkogawa@primenet.com (Bryan Ogawa)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.shells
Subject: Re: pdksh on freebsd is el-lame-o
Date: 15 Feb 1997 13:48:01 -0700
Organization: Primenet Services for the Internet
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <5e57e1$r16@nnrp1.news.primenet.com>
References: <3304CF88.15FB7483@pnk.com> <5e4ju8$kr4@klemm.gtn.com>
X-Posted-By: bkogawa@206.165.5.101 (bkogawa)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35715

andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) writes:

>In article <3304CF88.15FB7483@pnk.com>,
>	Curt Finch <curt@pnk.com> writes:
>> why me lard? why is pdksh so drain bamaged?

>Especially on FreeBSD or pdksh in general ?

[...]

I have heard that you can get real AT&T ksh for BSDI from somewhere in
Lucent or another.  you might want to see if you can run that (though it
requires 2.2 I think?) 


--
bryan k. ogawa  <bkogawa@primenet.com>  <bkogawa@netvoyage.net>