Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au!news.apana.org.au!cantor.edge.net.au!news.teragen.com.au!news.access.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!news.itd.umich.edu!honey From: honey@citi.umich.edu (peter honeyman) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Why no addusr? Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 10:28:49 EST Organization: Center for Information Technology Integration, Univ of Michigan Lines: 11 Message-ID: <1997Feb15.102849@screwem.citi.umich.edu> References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <DERAADT.97Feb10191845@zeus.theos.com> <5dtc0g$hd0@cynic.portal.ca> <1997Feb14.090136@screwem.citi.umich.edu> <5e2sb7$62a@panix2.panix.com> Reply-To: honey@citi.umich.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: screwem.citi.umich.edu Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5429 Thor Lancelot Simon writes: >the fact is, openbsd dominates netbsd, and theo's "bad" attitude has a >lot to do with that. I don't understand what you mean by "dominate" and in fact I suspect that you're leaving it deliberately vague. i mean it in the mathematical sense, as in graph or lattice theory, which is about as far from "deliberately vague" as you can get. peter