Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au!news.apana.org.au!cantor.edge.net.au!news.teragen.com.au!news.access.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Why no addusr? Date: 16 Feb 1997 04:11:40 -0500 Organization: Panix Lines: 41 Message-ID: <5e6j0c$pf1@panix2.panix.com> References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <DERAADT.97Feb15210103@zeus.pacifier.com> <5e62ct$rdo@news.bayarea.net> <5e6db9$8cg@news.pacifier.com> Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5396 In article <5e6db9$8cg@news.pacifier.com>, Jason Downs <downsj@threadway.teeny.org> wrote: >In article <5e62ct$rdo@news.bayarea.net>, >Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@baygate.bayarea.net> wrote: >]In article <DERAADT.97Feb15210103@zeus.pacifier.com>, >]Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com> wrote: >] >]>Prove it. >] >]The contents of the agreement are not public. End of story. (I, >]however, for various reasons, am privvy to them.) And I, unlike some >]people I know, do not publicly post non-public correspondence. >] >]>I say prove it. I say you are waving around some little non-existant >]>document. >] >]"See above." >] >]In any case, it suffices to say that I have the facts, and you do not. >]Therefore, I suggest you refrain from commenting, lest you discredit >]yourself further. > >The only ones being discredited here are those that answer an argument >by claiming their "facts" are proprietary. Has it occurred to you that one generally isn't free to just disclose such agreements for the amusement of sundry onlookers? If SCO has a problem with NetBSD, I'm sure they'll let the appropriate people know. Certainly, if you think they ought to sue us, you should fell free to try to get them to. That they won't ought to be evidence enough that we are doing just fine. I can't see how Jason's under any obligation to provide to you details of a confidential agreement just because you choose to be nasty about it. -- This space not left unintentionally unblank. tls@rek.tjls.com $OpenBSD: locore.s,v 1.5 1996/10/30: Blindly integrating source code, $OpenBSD: locore.s,v 1.7 1997/01/24: so you can lose for 8 weeks. "Sleep tight."