Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!newspump.sol.net!newsfeeds.sol.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!newshub1.home.com!news.home.com!newshub.internex.net!masters0.news.internex.net!deimos.nc.com!not-for-mail From: Aaron Kushner <akushner@deimos.nc.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Which 100Mbs ethernet card Date: 12 Feb 1997 01:54:13 GMT Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333 Lines: 12 Message-ID: <5dr7s5$f5f@masters0.InterNex.Net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.88.167.249 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 unoff BETA release 961201] Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35497 After looking through the kernel config file LINT, I noticed that the word "buggy" was appended to the line with the 3c59x 3com card. Does the intel etherexpress perform more reliably than the 3com cards for freebsd 2.1.5? Thanks, -- ======================================================================== Aaron Kushner Network Computer, Inc. Voice: 415.631.4159 100 Marine World Pkwy. Email: akushner@nc.com Redwood Shores, CA 94065