Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.bayarea.net!baygate.bayarea.net!thorpej From: thorpej@baygate.bayarea.net (Jason R. Thorpe) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Why no addusr? Date: 15 Feb 1997 19:22:27 GMT Organization: George's NetBSD answer man Lines: 14 Message-ID: <5e52dj$c8p@news.bayarea.net> References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <1997Feb14.090136@screwem.citi.umich.edu> <5e2sb7$62a@panix2.panix.com> <DERAADT.97Feb14205132@zeus.pacifier.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: baygate.bayarea.net Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5373 In article <DERAADT.97Feb14205132@zeus.pacifier.com>, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com> wrote: >Instead your project has developers that put #ifndef __OpenBSD__ into >NetBSD source files so the FREE code, when merged into another system >which happens to #define __OpenBSD__ will experience machine resets, >right? (Hint to those who are curious, go get an alpha locore.S from >January or so.) Well, the only suggestion I can offer is that you are more careful when integrating code in the future. -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@bayarea.net>