Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.indiana.edu!news From: Lars Hofhansl <lhofhans@indiana.edu> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy Subject: Re: A suggestion to Linux/Bsd Developers Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 13:43:03 -0600 Organization: Indiana University Lines: 30 Message-ID: <330611C6.7BD13AE@indiana.edu> References: <5d3sr2$44n@nntp1.best.com> <5dh0o6$ji9$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <slrn5fsqhn.58l.dmcook@mozart.cts.com> <3306f2e9.2166849@news.cyberion.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pionier.eigenmann.indiana.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-User: lars X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.29 i586) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:158305 comp.os.linux.networking:68410 comp.os.linux.setup:97237 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:5993 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2491 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:52879 comp.os.os2.advocacy:267569 Brad Collyer wrote: > > On 10 Feb 1997 00:23:46 GMT, dmcook@mozart.cts.com (David M. Cook) > wrote: > > >>From the previous thread in this newsgroup it is getting clear that, > >>unix is lacking a "cheap real word processor". (like MS Word) > > > >Your impression is incorrect. > > His impression is very correct. > > I've been searching for a good word processor for quite some time now > without much luck. I don't want to buy Motif just to demo an > application. Motif would probably cost approx. $150.00 (CDN) if I > chose to run the StarOffice applications. In fact, I'd love to run > StarOffice, it sounds like an excellent collection of apps. and the > screen shots I have seen look like there are many features I look for. > What features exactly would you expect from a wordprocessor, that are not included in Web-Authoring tools like netscape-gold or (especially) amaya (it needs motif, but a precompiled statically linked version for linux is available)? Well, admittedly there are some missing features (like setting the pagelayout etc.), but they are coming close to what I expect from a wordprocessor (your mileage may vary). Lars