*BSD News Article 88791


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail
From: claird@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (Cameron Laird)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.lang.tcl,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: "bad screen number"
Date: 9 Feb 1997 19:44:38 -0600
Organization: NeoSoft, Inc. +1 713 968 5800
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <5dlui6$a0f@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
References: <5dg1ta$an1@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.109.7.129
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35254 comp.lang.tcl:55676 comp.windows.x:94422

In article <5dg1ta$an1@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>, I pleaded:
>I can't get Wish to go.
>
>The proximate symptom is an "application-specific initialization
>failed: bad screen number '0'" diagnostic.  This amounts to a
			.
			.
			.
>running 2.1.6-RELEASE of FreeBSD.  It looks most like some kind
>of incompatibility between the Xlib.h and the -lX11 for the def-
>inition of Display, but I know of no changes in those, and
>certainly none that should affect my sources.  Binaries (xterm,
			.
			.
			.
Yup.  I was compiling with X11R4 (I think), and linking
with X11R6.  End of crisis.  I make a point of posting
this, though, because there are a couple of aspects to
my little drama that I think are of general interest.
More on those, in follow-ups of narrowed distribution.
-- 

Cameron Laird           http://starbase.neosoft.com/~claird/home.html
claird@NeoSoft.com      +1 713 623 8000 #227
                        +1 713 996 8546 FAX