Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!newsfeed.ed.ac.uk!edcogsci!richard From: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD Message-ID: <E58wv6.C8A@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh References: <slrn5fejrn.353.bet@onyx.interactive.net> <5d7spf$8n6@web.nmti.com> <5d8ikn$801$1@Venus.mcs.net> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 18:33:05 GMT Lines: 13 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:156680 comp.os.linux.advocacy:82719 comp.os.linux.setup:95870 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2339 In article <5d8ikn$801$1@Venus.mcs.net> les@MCS.COM (Leslie Mikesell) writes: >What's 'more reliable' than never crashing? Lots of machines in a variety of "stressful" environments never crashing? That is, you can't judge a system as reliable in general just on the basis of your machine in your application. I ran 386BSD 0.1 for ages without problems :-) -- Richard -- "Cake is a bistrubile cranabolic amphetamoid"