*BSD News Article 88407


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!lucy.swin.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!cs.mu.OZ.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!insync!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!206.109.2.48!bonkers!web.nmti.com!peter
From: peter@nmti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD
Date: 4 Feb 1997 17:48:31 GMT
Organization: Network/development platform support, NMTI
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <5d7spf$8n6@web.nmti.com>
References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <slrn5feb63.93l.ralsina@ultra7.unl.edu.ar> <32F73973.167EB0E7@freebsd.org> <slrn5fejrn.353.bet@onyx.interactive.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sonic.nmti.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:156408 comp.os.linux.advocacy:82574 comp.os.linux.setup:95693 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2285

In article <slrn5fejrn.353.bet@onyx.interactive.net>,
Bennett Todd <bet@nospam.interactive.net> wrote:
> >One reason that we have the Linux emulator (and EXT2FS) is to ease the
> >upgrade to FreeBSD from Linux.

> I've never heard of anybody going that way. Why would they want to?

FreeBSD is a lot more stable and reliable than Linux.

I've been evaluating Red Hat 4.0, so I could run Linux programs on my
FreeBSD box, but it's been flakey as hell (they REALLY broke the SCSI
subsystem on the install disk) and I think I'll just use the Linux
emulator.

And I know quite a few people who switched from Linux to FreeBSD. You're
about the first example of anyone going the other way that I'm aware
of.
-- 

             The Reverend Peter da Silva, ULC, COQO, BOFH.

                  Har du kramat din varg, idag? `-_-'