*BSD News Article 88295


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!lucy.swin.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!uunet!in2.uu.net!199.94.215.18!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!irz401!orion.sax.de!uriah.heep!news
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD slower than Linux ?
Date: 4 Feb 1997 00:20:59 GMT
Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <5d5vdb$emg@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <dkleinh.854654600@isotope.ps.uci.edu>
  <5crh6q$44j@synge.maths.tcd.ie> <87iv4ezj3c.fsf@mirriwinni.cse.rmit.edu.au>
  <5cta6n$eio@helena.mt.net> <5d4s48$gru@qnx.com>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6
X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669
X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F  93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35033

doug@qnx.com (Doug Santry) wrote:

> >Umm, no.  You can't emulate hardware floating point calls, which is what
> 
> Why not?  If no FPU is present, then the instructions will cause a trap
> which can be caught.  You know which instruction caused the trap, so just
> emulate it in software.

But that's way slower.

I think the basic tradeoff was that even nroff wouldn't run anymore,
which is needed to format the manuals.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)