Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!news.kei.com!news.texas.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.iquest.net!not-for-mail From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@freebsd.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy Subject: Re: Linux vs whatever Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 17:56:15 -0500 Organization: John S. Dyson's home machine Lines: 28 Message-ID: <32F51B8F.167EB0E7@freebsd.org> References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <5clgth$et2@qnx.com> <5cokjc$amq@web.nmti.com> <nVV8y0gTzX9Y091yn@ibm.net> <5ctv9v$ser@cynic.portal.ca> <D3P9y0gTzXhE091yn@ibm.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: dyson.iquest.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:155814 comp.os.linux.networking:67049 comp.os.linux.setup:95177 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2201 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:51684 comp.os.os2.advocacy:265219 Mouth of the South wrote: > > In article <5ctv9v$ser@cynic.portal.ca>, > cjs@cynic.portal.ca (Curt Sampson) wrote: > >In article <nVV8y0gTzX9Y091yn@ibm.net>, > > >>If we try to apply the GPL, which mandates > >>that source code must be freely available, to BSD licensed derivative > >>works, which allows it to be secretly hoarded, then GPL would forcibly > >>overrule the BSD license and nullify its terms. > > > >Um...exactly which of the terms would it nullify? (Please quote > >the exact text.) > > Reason it out. Mere knowledge that GPL mandates unrestricted access > to source code of derivative works while BSD doesn't means that the > two contradict each other on this point. > Under GPL you only have to redistribute source code to those that you have given object code to. Of course, the recipient of your source code CAN redistribute the source code of the derived works. But they will want to maintain good relations with their supplier, so it is not always likely that the customer (who receives the source) is going to bother to redistribute it (it is a cost/benefit tradeoff for them.) The customer becomes the 'hoarder' then :-). John