Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!hunter.premier.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!129.35.248.10!ausnews.austin.ibm.com!rtpnews.raleigh.ibm.com!news@rtpnews.raleigh.ibm.com From: nobody@read.my.sig (Joerg Pommnitz) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD Date: 30 Jan 1997 18:22:49 GMT Organization: IBM Lines: 12 Message-ID: <5cqotp$17d0@rtpnews.raleigh.ibm.com> References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <5c39sk$ddl@troma.rv.tis.com> <DERAADT.97Jan24040427@zeus.theos.com> <5ck1mr$e7r@amd40.wecs.org> Reply-To: nobody@read.my.sig (Joerg Pommnitz) NNTP-Posting-Host: a17.raleigh.ibm.com X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:155257 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2150 In <5ck1mr$e7r@amd40.wecs.org>, duane@herb.wecs.org (Duane Eddingfield) writes: > I wouldn't even think of running Usenet on Linux, it would fall over >in an hour! See: http://www.dejanews.com/dnabout.html#tech -- Joerg Pommnitz |Joerg@Raleigh.ibm.com| Never attribute to malloc Mobile/Wireless |Dept UMRA | that which can be adequately T/L (919)254-6397|Office B502/E117 | explained by stupidity.