Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!caen!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!newsserver.technet.sg!ntuix!ntrc25.ntrc.ntu.ac.sg!othman From: othman@ntrc25.ntrc.ntu.ac.sg (othman (EEE/Div 4)) Subject: Re: [386BSD],fix for SharedLibraries posted recently Message-ID: <1992Dec3.024846.15737@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> Sender: news@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: ntrc25.ntrc.ntu.ac.sg Organization: Nanyang Technological University - Singapore X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6] References: <veit.723127867@du9ds3> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1992 02:48:46 GMT Lines: 27 Holger Veit (veit@du9ds3) wrote: : Sorry, I couldn't resist. No flames here, may you be happy with your : shared libraries, but you support my argumentation quite well. I said : there will be different improved versions of this "shared libraries" : release RSN. We now already have a fix for the original posting, and : you just recognized the getopt problem. I wish you good luck for hunting : after other incompatible library functions; there are some more... : Why don't you help us instead of grumbling? Of course there will be some more, but it may be useful as it is. In fact I've compiled my bin, sbin, usr.bin, and usr.sbin for those small programs. Aren't there a lot more bugs in 0.1, even even 0.2 or any other releases ? Shouldn't we just open up everything and let people decide if they are good at whatever areas in? Inspiration comes at odd hours and places, and cannot be interrogated. We may get stuck at some stupid places which are obvious to everyone else, and yet can be very brtilliant at other times/places. Let there be variesties and let us decide by making actual measurements by anybody apart from the selected groups. -- Othman bin Ahmad, School of EEE, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2263. Internet Email: eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg