*BSD News Article 87474


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc
Subject: Re: IDE vs SCSI (was Re: Linux vs BSD)
Date: 25 Jan 1997 23:24:33 -0500
Organization: Panix
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <5cema1$e9a@panix2.panix.com>
References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <5cblts$emh@junkie.gnofn.org> <01bc0a7a$4d9c2d60$d69f389d@v-jurgex-main> <5cekfd$3c6@junkie.gnofn.org>
Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:154211 comp.os.linux.setup:93894 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:5735 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2030

In article <5cekfd$3c6@junkie.gnofn.org>,
Craig Johnston <craig@gnofn.org> wrote:
>In article <01bc0a7a$4d9c2d60$d69f389d@v-jurgex-main>,
>Jurgen Exner <v-jurgex@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>Craig Johnston <craig@gnofn.org> wrote in article
>><5cblts$emh@junkie.gnofn.org>...
>>> [...]
>>> similar to SCSI drives of the same capacity.  (excepting the high-end
>>> 7200RPM stuff -- do they even make EIDE drives this fast? )
>>
>>7200rpm isn't high-end any more.
>>Seagate already produces a line of 10.000rpm HDs.
>
>Please don't be pedantic.  It's not "highest end."  It's still 
>faster than most people are using.  I am aware of the 10,000 RPM
>seagate product -- prohibitively expensive at the moment.  
>
>Thank you for your useful post.

Well, perhaps this will be useful: don't waste a whole lot of your time
looking at that Seagate product; it's not significantly faster than the
7200RPM IBM drives with PRML and MR heads, since the IBM units get better
density.  There's more than one way to skin a cat.

-- 
Thor Lancelot Simon	                                          tls@panix.COM

 Stumbling drunk in the railyard looking for God: http://www.panix.com/~tls/