Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.idt.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!raven.eva.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!jca From: jca@bighorn.accessnv.com (J.C. Archambeau) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD or Linux (with Win95)? Date: 22 Jan 1997 01:57:43 GMT Organization: Access Nevada Inc. Lines: 19 Message-ID: <5c3s6n$akl@raven.eva.net> References: <5bsvup$cdq@netnews.upenn.edu> <5bu7g9$fa5@uriah.heep.sax.de> <87afq2ykom.fsf@localhost.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn.accessnv.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:34299 Peter Mutsaers (plm@xs4all.nl) wrote: : >> On 20 Jan 1997 22:42:57 GMT, jca@bighorn.accessnv.com : >> (J.C. Archambeau) said: : JCA> To have any sort of peaceful coexistance with any M$ OS you : JCA> need to install it prior to installing any Unix based OS. : JCA> Even M$-DOS will bit^H^H^Hcomplain if it's installed after : JCA> Unix. : Not any: NT 4.0 doesn't modify the MBR. But does it bit^H^H^Hcomplain if it's not installed first (i.e. first physical partition)? -- /* | Spam violation - e-mail dumped... ** Internet: jca@accessnv.com | Don't blame me, I didn't vote for Clinton. ** jca@anv.net | Intel is the word for 'errata.' */