Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.syd.connect.com.au!phaedrus.kralizec.net.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!grumpy.fl.net.au!news.webspan.net!newsfeeds.sol.net!hammer.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.Stanford.EDU!andrsn.stanford.edu!andrsn From: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: freebsd and win95osr2 (fat32) Date: 19 Jan 1997 07:00:54 GMT Organization: Stanford University Lines: 23 Message-ID: <5bsgr6$23i@nntp.Stanford.EDU> References: <01bc0308$c1901c00$321d47c0@ho.leissner.se> <32E04002.259E@hotmail.com> <32E05E85.167EB0E7@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: andrsn.stanford.edu X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 unoff BETA release 961126] Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:34206 Gabor Kincses <gabor@acm.org> wrote: > charles hanna wrote: > > > > > the coexistance of win95osr2 and freebsd? > > > > I've succeded in getting FreeBSD 2.1.5 running with win95 on the same > > hard drive, but I have each on it's own partition. I use the boot > > managaer that came with the Walnut Creek CDROM. > > > > Glenn. > Is that OS-BS (135 or Beta) or BootEasy? > Both are on the 2.1.5 CDROM. My employer > wants me to install W95 sooner or later. > So I'm bracing myself. :( They both work; but be prepared for installing the boot manager after you've installed Win95, which will destroy the master boot record. Probably doing it from a bootable floppy is best; Win95 itself will not let you write to the MBR. Annelise