*BSD News Article 86955


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!mn6.swip.net!seunet!news2.swip.net!nike.volvo.se!cyklop.volvo.se!peter
From: peter@cyklop.volvo.se (peter hakanson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Running several networking cards in one system?
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Date: 17 Jan 1997 19:28:53 GMT
Organization: Volvo Corp.
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <5bojtl$hoq@nike.volvo.se>
References: <6OBfLaMbNgB@me-tech.pfm-mainz.de> <5bo2rh$k6b@innocence.interface-business.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cyklop.volvo.se
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.misc:1939 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:5631 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:34164 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5189

The load balancing could (anyone surpriced ?) easily be 
done with real (aka cisco) routers.

Is'nt this discussion a litte out of track now ?

J Wunsch (j@ida.interface-business.de) wrote:
: mschmidt@me-tech.PFM-Mainz.de (Michael Schmidt) wrote:

: > > You can have a dozen of network cards in a BSD
: > > system (but not in a PC, since you'll run out of IRQ lines :).
: >
: > Well, meanwhile I have heard of networking cards with several ports on each
: > card.  Putting several of these cards in a system then you should have more
: > than what I have been asking for...

: Sure, this is possible.  Put two of them into one box, and you've got
: 8 ethernet interfaces.  With IP, this requires 8 different IP
: addresses (of course), so you can route packets into 8 different
: directions.

: What you still _can't_ do however is:

:      +---------+       	       	       +---------+
:      |  Box 1  |		       | Box 2   |
:      |192.168.1|		       |192.168.1|
:      |    .1   o-----------------------o  .2     |
:      |         |		       |         |
:      |    .9   o-----------------------o  .10    |
:      |         |		       |         |
:      |    .17  o-----------------------o  .18    |
:      |         |		       |         |
:      |    .25  o-----------------------o  .26    |
:      |         |		       |         |
:      |         |		       |         |
:      +---------+		       +---------+

: ...and then try sending something in a single connection from Box 1 to
: Box 2, hoping that the traffic will be distributed across all 4 wires.
: This is the way IP works: you are not going to connect to another
: _machine_, but to another IP address.  Sitting on box 1, you have to
: decide for an outgoing request whether it should go to 192.168.1.2,
: 192.168.1.10, 192.168.1.18, or 192.168.1.26.  Depending on which of
: these addresses you're using, you select the local interface und thus
: the wire that will be used.

: If you're looking into increasing throughput, it's probably better to
: switch to 100 Mbit/s Ethernet, or to FDDI.

: --
: J"org Wunsch					       Unix support engineer
: joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de       http://www.interface-business.de/~j


--
--
<peter.devnull@cyklop.volvo.se> (remove ".devnull" before use!)
Peter Hakanson  VolvoData Dep 2580 phone +46 31 66 74 27