Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!supernews.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!165.254.2.53!nonexistent.com!not-for-mail From: le@put.com (Louis Epstein) Subject: Re: 2.1.6 versus 2.2 X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0] X-Nntp-Posting-User: le Lines: 16 Organization: Putnam Internet Services Message-ID: <E3wsox.I3y@nonexistent.com> References: <01bbfd80$e983f0c0$6330fa9e@org-qsar2.chem.msu.su> <1997Jan8.175840.28795@wavehh.hanse.de> <01bbfff9$a4b6bec0$df6d04c7@zellion.cyberwind.com> X-Trace: 853095486/16793 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: main.put.com Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 18:58:08 GMT Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:33793 Jeffery T. White (zellion@cyberwind.com) wrote: : > Personally, I already run 2.2-Alpha and 2.2-Beta. I find them to be : > more "polished" for my needs, many changes since 2.1.x work in : > directions that are more intuitive for me. If there are bugs in these : > new/changed functionality, they are not bad enough to show up here. : : I put up a 2.2 SNAP (101496 I think) and it is very stable... If it were : not for limited time I would upgrade my 2.1.5 to 2.2 BETA. I just am short : of time for upgrades right now, but I will go to 2.2-RELEASE day one. IMHO : many of the supposed "less than stable" versions of FreeBSD are more stable : than any product EVER released from say Microsoft or a host of other : developers. Hmmm...I've had more problems with my FreeBSD boxes than my DOS boxes,but I cringe at the very idea of trying to get DOS boxes to do what my FreeBSD boxes do around the clock...