*BSD News Article 86214


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!news-ber1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.dkrz.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!news.Hanse.DE!wavehh.hanse.de!cracauer
From: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de (Martin Cracauer)
Subject: Re: Apple/NeXTStep/Mach and free Unixes (Re: Pentium Pro and FreeBSD)
Message-ID: <1997Jan4.183049.25646@wavehh.hanse.de>
Reply-To: cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de
Organization: '(a (cons structive organization))
References: <32C063E4.69BE@ibm.net> <5a9gnt$82j@fridge-nf0.shore.net> <tporczyk.851992328@shellx> <5a9osm$f9t@fridge-nf0.shore.net> <5a9tn8$6on@flea.best.net> <tporczyk.852002722@shellx>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 97 18:30:49 GMT
Lines: 52
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:33621

tporczyk@best.com (Tony Porczyk) writes:

>dillon@flea.best.net (Matt Dillon) writes:

>>    This whole java thing reminds me of lisp all those years ago, 
>>    especially with SUNs javachip stuff.  It almost makes me want
>>    to cry, but I'm to busy laughing at the moment.  Somebody
>>    thinks up of a cute-sounding language, and suddenly it's the
>>    savior of the world... HA!

>Yeah, I know, yet, the idea of decoupling apps from the Microsoft's
>death grip is a noble thing in itself.  The question is, does it have a
>chance to succeed.  I went through the same hoopla (kindof) years ago
>at Novell when they were pronouncing to the world how AppFoundation was
>going to make the world platform independent.  Well, we all know what a
>spectacular failure that was... I actually think there is a place for
>Java, as a way to run small pieces of software like configuration
>utilities (instead of telnetting to devices and using vt100) on
>whatever platform is available.  I do have a hard time seeing how JIT
>compilers are going to keep up with monstrous apps of today, though...
>And how companies are going to all follow the same standard withouth
>"featuring" it to death.  Oh, well, a bit of dreaming before New Year
>strikes.

Well, for me Java is attractive mainly from a component-building
view. Imagine a newsreader where the user can use his/her own
implementation of a killfile mechanism by providing a .class file. The
Java-based HTTP servers do similar things.

On the other hand, I'm as concernd as you that JITs are overrated
(reading the JVM specification educates quite a bit regarding maximum
speed of Java).

Companies are obviously willing to give up some native platform look,
performance and functionality to get universal, easy-to-use,
low-maintainaince applications to the casual users.  On the other
hand, Java might be crushed between pure HTML (maybe with Javascript
extensions) for easy tasks and ActiveX-Components for company-based
solutions.

FreeBSD relevance: Keep on approaching the best possible code for a
given task (which is what C does).

Personal relevance: When free in choice, use the language that gives
the best abstraction capabilities (Lisp does for me).

Martin
-- 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin_Cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de http://cracauer.cons.org  Fax.: +4940 5228536
"As far as I'm concerned,  if something is so complicated that you can't ex-
 plain it in 10 seconds, then it's probably not worth knowing anyway"- Calvin