*BSD News Article 85361


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!enews.sgi.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!165.254.2.53!nonexistent.com!not-for-mail
From: le@put.com (Louis Epstein)
Subject: Re: Apache and FreeBSD versions
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
X-Nntp-Posting-User: le
Lines: 71
Organization: Putnam Internet Services
Message-ID: <E2uMxK.5z2@nonexistent.com>
References: <E2FwC0.4yy@nonexistent.com> <E2MKzC.Ks7@nonexistent.com> <32BCF239.683B@www.play-hookey.com> <E2tw30.JKp@nonexistent.com> <32BD916C.4B5F@www.play-hookey.com>
X-Trace: 851315094/5622
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: main.put.com
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 1996 04:24:55 GMT
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:32883

Ken Bigelow (kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com) wrote:
: Louis Epstein wrote:
: > 
: > Ken Bigelow (kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com) wrote:
: > : Louis Epstein wrote:
: > : >
: > : > Louis Epstein (le@put.com) wrote:
: > : > : Recent discussions of Apache and FreeBSD vs. Netscape etc. made me look
: > : > : in /usr/ports/distfiles to see what version of Apache I had,I installed
: > : > : it when I just got my FreeBSD 2.1 running and haven't looked since.
: > : > :
: > : > : I have 1.0.0.
: > : > :
: > : > : Some time ago I copied a new Ports Collection onto my HD,which specifies
: > : > : version 1.0.5,but I don't know if trying to install this would work,as
: > : > : the file's likely not there any more...just like the link on the FreeBSD
: > : > : Release Information Page(which still says the 2.1.6 release "will
: > : > : probably occur in the next 2-3 months") announcement for 2.0 Alpha
: > : > : gives a supposed link from which one could FTP FreeBSD 2.0A which of
: > : > : course doesn't work!
: > : > :
: > : > : The current Ports Collection entry is apparently for 1.1.1.
: > : > :
: > : > : The version they are now hawking at www.apache.org is 1.2b2.
: > : >
: > : > This is now the one in the Ports Collection as of 12/17.
: > : >
: > : > : I'm wondering what I may gain by upgrading Apache,AND if doing
: > : > : it before or after an upgrade of FreeBSD 2.1 to 2.1.6 would make
: > : > : a difference...or what difference in performance might be attributable
: > : > : to each change if I did both.
: > : > :
: > : > : I understand the previous discussion said 2.2,but not 2.1.6,
: > : > : had been tweaked to run WWW faster,but in an ISP operation
: > : > : environment stability's the key...I suppose that,with reference to the
: > : > : mentioned caching program,Squid 1.0.22 would be a better bet than
: > : > : 1.1.0.

[just replaced by 1.1.1 in the past week...yes,1.1.0 was buggy]

: > : My priority is also stability. I'm running Apache 1.1.1 on FreeBSD 2.1R
: > : with no problems. I will leave it this way for the present, to retain
: > : that stability. I won't be upgrading to either 2.1.5 or 2.1.6 on the
: > : server machine, with 2.2R just around the corner. As soon as I know 2.2
: > : is truly stable, I expect to upgrade to that platform, but I can't see
: > : changing the platform every couple of months under my circumstances.
: > 
: > 2.1.6 is,we have been told repeatedly,stabler than 2.2...the analogous
: > release of 2.2 isn't due until summer '97.I've been running 2.1 since
: > the end of '95,and if 2.1.6 is better,I figure it may be worth the
: > upgrade hassle,while early 2.2.x won't be.(Just as I'd be likelier to
: > go from 2.2.[max x] to 3.1 than to 3.0.)
: 
: You're right, of course. And it's also true that 2.1.6 has some
: capabilities not present in 2.1R. We'll see; I've been planning on
: upgrading the hardware as well as the FreeBSD OS. I expect I'll get the
: new hardware first; I've been considering going to a PCI board. But my
: 33.6K dialup is still the primary bottleneck...

Meaning you run a WWW server on the customer end of a dialup?
(I run an ISP with a 384K line,customers presently dialing in at
28.8 though expansion will be 33.6K or ISDN or some combination).

My next motherboard/CPU will be PCI,I suppose...current set is 
VLB at its max(486 DX4-120). 

: 
: As for Squid, I've seen references to both it and CERN cache in my
: agent_log file, but I haven't tried it, and so have no opinion.

See http://squid.nlanr.net/Squid for their claims.