*BSD News Article 84521


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 2105 bsd
Message-ID: <32A71A98.7342@amersham.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 18:55:20 +0000
From: Michael Cole <mjc@amersham.co.uk>
Organization: Amersham International
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.5 sun4m)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.infosystems.www.servers.misc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Apache much slower than Netscape ! ?
References: <aak2.848946036@Isis.MsState.Edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: prospero.life.amersham.co.uk
Lines: 23
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-out.internetmci.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!oleane!plug.news.pipex.net!pipex!soap.news.pipex.net!pipex!dish.news.pipex.net!pipex!vulcan!
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix:22937 comp.infosystems.www.servers.misc:6282 comp.unix.solaris:91815 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:32247

Atif Ahmad Khan wrote:
> 
> We have just setup a test Pentium PRO 200 server running Solaris X86 2.5.1
> (all latest patches applied) and got Stronghold secure server (Apache
> with SSL patches) and tried to run some benchmarks.
> 
> We were very excited about the new server and were thinking that it was
> going to beat the pants off of our Netscape 1.2 on FreeBSD 2.1 Pent 90 combo.
> Imagine our surprise when we found out that Netscape is roughly 6 times
> faster.  I am  not sure what to blame, the Solaris OS or Apache or Stronghold.
> 
> Something is not right somewhere and I am not sure how to pin it down.
> Any helpful hints would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Atif Khan
> aak2@ra.msstate.edu

I guess you are running the Netscape server with the SSL turned on as
well ?  
I'm not that well up on SSL but I guess if the Apache is having to
encrypt/decrypt 
and the Netscape is not then the former could be up to 10 ? times
slower.

Michael.