Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.rapidnet.com!news.rapidnet.com!not-for-mail
From: dpi@rapidnet.com (Doug Ingraham)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: 386DX-40 or 486SX-33?
Date: 7 Dec 1996 09:31:39 -0700
Organization: RapidNet
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <58c65b$2g8@rapidnet.com>
References: <nigel.32.00137D82@znet.net.au> <5898qk$kgl@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu> <nigel.33.000056AD@znet.net.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rapidnet.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
: I wasn't planning on spending money - I already have both motherboards and
: was wondering which one will be more efficient????
Unless you have a working Co-processor on the 386DX the 486SX will be about
twice as fast computationally overall (all other things being equal).
--
Doug Ingraham A hundred times every day I remind myself that my inner
Rapid City, SD and outer life depends on the labours of other men,
USA living and dead and that I must exert myself in order
to give in the same measure as I have received.
-Albert Einstein