Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.mathworks.com!enews.sgi.com!ix.netcom.com!netcom.net.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!wgold.demon.co.uk From: James Mansion <james@wgold.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc,han.sys.ibmpc Subject: Re: BSD on multi processor is non sence? Date: Sat, 30 Nov 1996 16:46:47 +0000 Organization: Westongold Ltd Lines: 10 Message-ID: <32A064F7.53C6@wgold.demon.co.uk> References: <01bbdd8f$6ad61f20$392798a3@dream.korea.ac.kr> NNTP-Posting-Host: wgold.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: wgold.demon.co.uk X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:1172 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:31810 comp.unix.bsd.misc:1635 ±èżº wrote: > I don't think Solaris for x86 is the only solution! No, SCO UnixWare 2.1 will work on it too (and should be rather fast). Or should do. It supportw twin CPUs out of the box I believe, so you'll need some extra processor enablers. James