*BSD News Article 83884


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.idt.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!super.zippo.com!zdc!szdc!szdc-e!news
From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@freebsd.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Serious brain damage in /bin/sh for FreeBSD 2.1.5
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 02:54:45 -0500
Organization: John S. Dyson's home machine
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <329E96C5.41C67EA6@freebsd.org>
References: <stanbE1M2D2.38I@netcom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386)
To: Stan Brown <stanb@netcom.com>
CC: dyson@freebsd.org

Stan Brown wrote:
>
>         I realize all Berkley centric people think the workd revolves around
> csh, but the rest of us don't.
> 
Well, I do as much BSD development as almost anyone...  I hate csh. :-).

>
>         Seriously, whats the rationale behind this half hearted atempt at
> making /bin/sh look like ksh ?
>
FreeBSD /bin/sh is actually kind-of close to Bourne shell with a few
additions,
like command editing.  Using the Bourne shell is quite painful after
using
ksh and bash...  (Yeah, I know that bash doesn't do everything that ksh
does.)

> 
>         Is there some way that I can fix this ?
>
You might try to make ksh /bin/sh.  It might work.
If you are patient, I can check it out in a few days to see if it
works (on 2.2.)

John
dyson@freebsd.org