Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!newsfeed.rice.edu!rice!news.Rice.edu!rich From: rich@Rice.edu (Richard Murphey) Subject: Re: [386BSD] STILL SILO overflows, X problems. In-Reply-To: vax@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu's message of 30 Nov 92 09:53:18 GMT Message-ID: <RICH.92Nov30134115@omicron.Rice.edu> Sender: news@rice.edu (News) Reply-To: Rich@rice.edu Organization: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University References: <84484@ut-emx.uucp> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1992 19:41:15 GMT Lines: 14 In article <84484@ut-emx.uucp> vax@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Vax) writes: On a similar note, I have applied all the patches and initx/startx complain that my kernel does not have X support. I 'config GENERICISA'ed it, and then 'make depend' 'make'd it, then I copied it to /386bsd. The new ^^ not sure about that. kernel is about 40-60k larger. Still no luck. Am I missing something? make sure your kernel configuration file includes the options: options XSERVER,UCONSOLE Otherwise the X support wil be #ifdefed out. XFree86 includes a note about about this in the README.386bsd file. Perhaps it's time we made this a default rather than a n option. Rich