Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:631 comp.unix.bsd:8329
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!psinntp!ficc!peter
From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T)
Message-ID: <id.S38V.GYG@ferranti.com>
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <1992Nov17.160727.9137@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> <1egusmINNtu@terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz> <1ehqvhINNl3b@morrow.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:07:23 GMT
Lines: 14
In article <1ehqvhINNl3b@morrow.stanford.edu> karish@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Chuck Karish) writes:
> Funny, I had thought that OSF/1 was based on Mach and the
> 4.3BSD superstructure atop the Mach kernel. Its reason for
> existence is to provide an alternative to System V.
OSF/2 is to be based on Mach. OSF/1 is based on AIX, which is licensed from
System V. I don't recall which release, but it's before 3.0. What actually
goes into AIX is a different matter, and it's quite unlike BSD or SysV by
all reports.
--
Peter da Silva / 77487-5012 USA / +1 713 274 5180
true(<<VV$@\\$'&O 9$O%'$LT$&$"V6"$&$<4$?'&$ #I&&?$=$<<@)24 24 scale 3 21 moveto
{dup 36 eq{pop not}{dup 7 and 4 sub exch 56 and 8 div 4 sub 2 index{rlineto}{
rmoveto}ifelse}ifelse}forall stroke pop showpage % Har du kramat din varg idag?