Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!nntp.crl.com!news3.crl.com!nexp.crl.com!usenet From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: is 2.2-961014 bugfree? or when is 2.2.0? Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 05:52:15 -0800 Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM Lines: 18 Message-ID: <327DF50F.3F54BC7E@FreeBSD.org> References: <54tp9b$7eb@villa.fc.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386) To: Kevin at Freeside Support <kevintx@freeside.fc.net> Kevin at Freeside Support wrote: > How stable/bugfree is the 2.2-961014-SNAP system? Should it be used I'm using it in a few places, supplemented by recent builds from -current. No major problems so far. > production machine or would I be better off with just 2.1.5-RELEASE (even > though it lacks some of the fixes/niceties that have gone into 2.2)? Unless you're really FreeBSD literate, yes, that would be my suggestion. > How far is FreeBSD from putting out 2.2.0-RELEASE? With 2.2 so far along > in development, it would be worth waiting a little while to go with that. Expect it sometime after new years. -- - Jordan Hubbard President, FreeBSD Project