*BSD News Article 82105


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!cray-ymp.acm.stuorg.vt.edu!grail
From: Giao Nguyen <grail@cray-ymp.acm.stuorg.vt.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Anyone compiled a kernel using pgcc?
Date: 2 Nov 1996 07:20:57 GMT
Organization: ACM Student Machine
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <55esop$lj7@solaris.cc.vt.edu>
References: <3279FCFC.237C228A@systemics.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cray-ymp.acm.stuorg.vt.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 unoff BETA release 961025]

In comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com> wrote:
: Hi,

: Has anyone out there had any success compiling a kernel (in my case, the
: October SNAP) using pgcc, the pentium optimised compiler?

: Is this recommended, or is this likely to make my kernel less reliable?

I've done this with 2.1.0. It will work perfectly fine. However, it 
definitely will not work with any of the *really* spiffy optimization flags.
If memory (it's been a while) serves, the compile dies if you use 
-mpentium -O3 (or greater). There's alll sorts of comparison between
unsigned to signed integers warnings.

As for speed, I never did bother to benchmark things.

: Many thanks,

: Gary
: --
: pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
: Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06

-- 
Giao Nguyen
Computer Science Student
Will program for food