*BSD News Article 81541


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!nntp.inet.fi!news.funet.fi!news.cs.hut.fi!news.clinet.fi!not-for-mail
From: mickey@cantina.clinet.fi (Mika Ruohotie)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD as news-server??
Date: 22 Oct 1996 13:06:39 +0300
Organization: Clinet, Espoo, Finland
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <54i6bf$kic@cantina.clinet.fi>
References: <537ddl$3cc@amd40.wecs.org> <544nas$b5h@flash.noc.best.net> <5456rv$kbu@polaris.eurocontrol.fr> <545nm7$bd1@flash.noc.best.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cantina.clinet.fi
NNTP-Posting-User: mickey

Matthew Dillon <dillon@best.com> wrote:

>    Nonsense.  Why does everyone seem to believe that, somehow, .overview
>    is more magical then some random article file?  Scanning .overview once
>    per group is an order of magnitude less expensive then reading 10 articles
>    in the group.  It's in the noise.  My newsreader machine is happily wonking
>    away with 250 online nnrpd users with the .overview in the spool.
>
>    It is NOT a big deal people!  There is nothing magical about .overview
>    files.
>
>					-Matt
>
yes, and there's prove to that too i think... i run news server on my
machine, it's small, in some relative way... one group i am not expiring
ever has about 12 megs .overview since there's some 47 thousand
something articles beginning from dec 95, and i havent noticed that
it'd be slow in any way... the group itself eats some 150 megs.

not that i'm sure that it proves anything... =)


mickey