*BSD News Article 81188


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.netspace.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.syd.connect.com.au!news.bri.connect.com.au!corolla.OntheNet.com.au!news
From: Tony Griffiths <tonyg@OntheNet.com.au>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Minimum machine for nameservice?
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 11:01:31 +1000
Organization: On the Net (ISP on the Gold Coast, Australia)
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <326ACB6B.6EDE@OntheNet.com.au>
References: <chad-1710962353430001@sverige.pengar.com>
Reply-To: tonyg@OntheNet.com.au
NNTP-Posting-Host: swanee.nt.com.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I)
To: Chad Leigh <chad@pengar.com>

Chad Leigh wrote:
> 
> Hi All
> 
> I am needing to set up a nameserver and would like to make a minimum
> machine that will do the job (costwise).  The only purpose of this machine
> is name service for soon to be busy domains (x 2).
> 
> P75 or AMD K5-P75 or P90

These machine are massive overkill unless you are talking about a "."
server, or maybe a ".com"!!!

> 8mb RAM

At ~ USD 8/MB, I wouldn't skimp here, especially if you are connecting
to the Internet and running a WWW proxy, et al.

> 850 HD EIDE (gotten cheap already)
> NE2000 clone
> cheapo graphics adapter

Probably OK although I've seen problem with an NE2000 clone (SVEC) on
Pentium/PCI machines.  I've upgraded all my Px machine to PCI based
Ethernet cards (SMC/DEC 21x4x) because of SVEC problems!

> 
> I guess the biggest question is: is 8mb enough?  Only running named
>
You're wasting the machine ONLY running 'named'.  Systat will barely get
off the 99% idle mark.
 
> thanks
> Chad