Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!eru.mt.luth.se!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!agate!overload.lbl.gov!gracie.lbl.gov!jin From: jin@gracie.lbl.gov (Jin Guojun[ITG]) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: 100 BT ethernet card. Which one is better? Date: 8 Oct 1996 01:06:05 GMT Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Lines: 13 Message-ID: <53c9du$2tg@overload.lbl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: gracie.lbl.gov It seems that there were some disscussion about 3COM 100 BaseT ethercard 3C590 sometimes ago. Is this a better 100 BaseT ethernet card? Would some one please advice on the 100 BaseT ethercards? Within Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B, Novell NE2000, SMC EtherPower 10/100 (Model 9332), and 3C590, which one is easy to use and has less problems? Thanks in advance, -- /-------------- Jin Guojun ------------ v ---- Internet: g_jin@lbl.gov ----\ | Imaging & Distributed Computing | Usenet: ucbvax!g_jin@lbl.gov | | Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory | Bitnet: -- | | 50B-2239, Berkeley, CA 94720 - jin%george.lbl.gov@Csa3.LBL.Gov |