Return to BSD News archive
#! rnews 1600 bsd Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!feed1.news.erols.com!news From: Ken Bigelow <kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Linux Date: Sun, 06 Oct 1996 09:02:55 +0000 Organization: Erol's Internet Services Lines: 25 Message-ID: <325775BF.6ACB@www.play-hookey.com> References: <3246f8e0.1466924@news.telepac.pt> <324924E5.49B6@usoft.nl> <324AC49E.1CD3@pressconnect.com> <52pfff$d93@uriah.heep.sax.de> <52qhfj$o6a@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <m2n2y4f17u.fsf@golfgod.raleigh.ibm.com> <32560997.79E1@www.play-hookey.com> <32567105.4487EB71@foundit.com> Reply-To: kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com NNTP-Posting-Host: kenjb05.play-hookey.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; U) Joe wrote: > > Ken Bigelow wrote: > > > But go ahead and test Linux and FreeBSD; they are at least reasonable in > > this kind of context. Also take a look through the thread "Unix too > > slow..." in this NG for some comments from others about NT versus Unix > > clones. > > Some hard performance numbers would go a long way in the "Unix too slow > ..." thread. I'm sure alot of people would be interested. > > just a thought, > Joe Preferably starting with Ziff-Davis, which made the initial claim. The thought is quite valid. But I won't hold my breath... -- Ken Are you interested in | byte-sized education | http://www.play-hookey.com over the Internet? |