*BSD News Article 79632


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!hunter.premier.net!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!irz401!orion.sax.de!uriah.heep!news
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Linux
Date: 30 Sep 1996 21:52:47 GMT
Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <52pfff$d93@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <3246f8e0.1466924@news.telepac.pt> <324924E5.49B6@usoft.nl>
  <324AC49E.1CD3@pressconnect.com>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6
X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669
X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F  93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E

Mischka Hughes <mischkah@pressconnect.com> wrote:

> How about robustness - I need a server / OS combination that is totally
> stable. It must never go down. I am prepared to pay the price of a
> little slowness for robustness.

Get an Auspex. ;-)

> Now what do you recommend, FreeBSD or Linux or even Linux-FT.

Since you're asking in the FreeBSD group: get FreeBSD. :)

Some people claim it were more stable and in particular more robust
under load than Linux.  Since i cannot judge by own experience, i'll
simply pass this on uncommented.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)