Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.third-wave.com!lucy.third-wave.com!dvanecek From: dvanecek@third-wave.com (David Vanecek) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Linux Date: 26 Sep 1996 02:57:02 GMT Organization: Bedford, Penna Lines: 39 Message-ID: <52crdu$jqs@news.third-wave.com> References: <3246f8e0.1466924@news.telepac.pt> <52brol$2gg@orion.cybercom.net> Reply-To: dvanecek@third-wave.com NNTP-Posting-Host: bed17.third-wave.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] The Classiest Man Alive (ksmm@cybercom.net) wrote: : Luis Sismeiro (luis.sismeiro@mail.telepac.pt) wrote: : : I am interested in knowing the differences and the advantages of : : FreeBSD compared with Linux. : In my (limited and humble) opinion, FreeBSD shines when it comes to : stability. The system has been in use for years in lots of different : incarnations; it's tried and true. Another advantage is the fact that : it shares the same lineage as lots of commercial Unixes, e.g., BSDI, : DEC OSF, and SunOS. That makes it easy to learn and apply knowledge : from manuals written for those other systems. : Linux is usually easier to set up and use. The more open development : model has the advantage that virtually every popular device (and lots : of not-so-popular ones) are supported. Development proceeds at : breakneck speeds, and most people have hardly configured a new kernel : before it's made obsolete by the next minor version with new features. : This isn't without its disadvatages, however, and every now and then : some instability creeps in. Patches come out even faster than new : releases, though, so problems are usually found and dealt with quickly. : I think that more commercial and high-level software developers are : paying attention to porting to Linux than FreeBSD. This may not be a : concern because FreeBSD has binary compatibility with several other : BSD-style Unixes. Linux is the closest thing to a "Plug-and-Play" Unix : system that I've ever seen. : Analogies between OS/2 and Windows come to mind, but I won't go into : that for fear of having myself flamed off the newsgroup :-). There's : not any reason (barring disk space, of course) that you couldn't try : them both. I use them both regularly. : Good luck with your decision, : K.S. This response should be placed in the FAQ. Thanks! D.Vanecek