Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cs.utexas.edu!news.tamu.edu!news.utdallas.edu!nrchh45.rich.nt.com!ferret.ocunix.on.ca!resurrect From: merlin@magic.metawire.com (Marc MERLIN) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.infosystems.www.misc Subject: Re: Unix too slow for a Web server? Date: 20 Sep 1996 11:36:38 -0700 Organization: Private Linux Box based on Red Hat Linux Lines: 18 Message-ID: <R.51uo7m$bu9@magic.metawire.com> References: <323ED0BD.222CA97F@pobox.com> <51pog8$1gj@newsbr.eunet.fr> <Dy0K58.MLv@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <32423719.6904CE4@julia.de> Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:131460 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:27903 comp.infosystems.www.misc:44054 Reposting article removed by rogue canceller. In article <32423719.6904CE4@julia.de>, -mat- filid brandy <brandy@julia.de> wrote: >Slan, > >I don't have to buy more TCP-sockets, when I will really need them. >There is/were a limit of >10 sockets a time in NT. > >I tested a i486 with apache to make 70.000 hits/s and only have load 4. Somewhere else in this thread, someone mentionned 300 hps, which is already impossible to reach on such a PC, but 70Khps is ridiculous. Did you mean 70Kpd (per day)? Marc -- Home page: http://www.efrei.fr/~merlin/ (browser friendly)